Review Comment:
The article is much improved. The contribution of the feature engineering work the authors present is clear, and the review of Turkish NER is helpful and thorough. Resources are shared. I have only minor comments mostly related to language, though note that this is not a thorough proofread:
-The old title remains at the tops of the pages
-Page 2, "Chineese"
-Page 2, "experimented for various" -> "experimented with for various"
-Page 2, "(MRLs) poses" -> "pose"
-Page 2, "as it is the case" -> "as is the case"
-Page 2, "is treated to have influence" -> are considered? are suggested?
-Page 3, "makes a preliminary investigation on" -> "of"
-Page 3, "which sometimes allowed to" -> "allowed them to" or "made it possible to"
-Page 3, "performances listed in Table 1 is" -> "are"
-Page 4, "of a NE is" -> "of an NE are"
-Page 4, sentence beginning "The study reports" is double negated
-Page 4, "except the use" -> "except for the use"
-Page 5, "do not namely mention" -> explicitly mention?
-Page 5, "child stories" -> children's stories?
-Page 5, "reports a CoNLL score" -> report
-Page 5, "systems which mostly needs" -> need
-Page 5, "annotated by ENAMEX" -> with
-Page 5, "dedicated for" -> to
-Page 5, "resulted with the emergence" -> resulted in
-Page 5, "introduces a Twitter dataset" -> introduce
-Page 6, "As known", would have to be "as we know", but better just to leave it out?
-Page 6, "makes hard" -> "makes it hard"
-Page 6, "eliminates the dependency of the recent works towards the Twitter content only" -> "eliminates the limitation to Twitter content found in recent work"?
-Page 6, section heading 5 not capitalized.
-Page 7, "this is an automatic processing" -> "automatic process". The comma is also not required in that sentence.
-Page 10, "treated to be" -> considered?
-Page 10, "Eight different features used" -> are used
-Page 10, "yields at very high" -> a
-Page 10, "indicating that the current token" -> whether
-Page 12, "as it was the case" -> "as was the case"
-Page 12, "The reason for this may be explained .."--I don't understand this sentence
-Page 12, "This section give" -> gives
-Page 12, "the remaining of this section" -> remainder
-Page 13, "percantage"
-Page 13, "used for the used CRF features" -> chosen features? selected?
-Page 14, "try to adapt a similar" -> tries
-Page 14, "as the omission lexical features"--section in parentheses is not grammatical
-Page 14, "we consider that the claims deducted from here"--needs rewording
|