Fans Reconstruct Heroes: Modeling Fictional Characters in Participatory Culture

Tracking #: 4142-5356

Authors: 
Xiaoyan Yang
Federico Pianzola

Responsible editor: 
Guest Editors 2025 OD+CH

Submission type: 
Full Paper
Abstract: 
The study of fictional characters has always been a crucial part of literary research, and the rise of participatory culture has made character representation increasingly dynamic and complex. This paper focuses on the character module of the GOLEM ontology---a formal framework for modelling and comparing fictional characters across cultures, narrative traditions, and reading communities---and makes three distinct contributions. First, it provides a theoretically grounded account of the module's design, situating key decisions within established debates in literary theory, from structuralist character functions to cognitive-narratological approaches. Second, it presents a formal comparison against existing ontologies for fictional characters, demonstrating that no existing model simultaneously supports cross-work character identity, context-specific attribute variability, provenance of reinterpretations, and flexible linking of character instances across narrative versions. Third, it contributes an empirical case study on Greek mythology fanfiction from Archive of Our Own, evaluated through ten expert-formulated competency questions as SPARQL queries. The dual-layer model (G0_Character-Stoff / G1_Character), a controlled vocabulary derived from 3,211 character feature concepts, and the SPARQL-based evaluation together demonstrate GOLEM's capacity to represent both canonical characterisations and fan-driven reinterpretations within a single interoperable knowledge graph.
Full PDF Version: 
Tags: 
Reviewed

Decision/Status: 
Accept

Solicited Reviews:
Click to Expand/Collapse
Review #1
Anonymous submitted on 24/Sep/2026
Suggestion:
Accept
Review Comment:

This is the second revision of the paper, which was submitted after a minor revision request.
The new version substantially improves the previous ones by clarifying the relationship with previous related work, including the paper presenting the GOLEM ontology, adding an explicit reliability assessment of the Sentence-BERT-based matching process and explaining in more detail some of the data modelling decisions. The cover letter provides a very clear and detailed explanation of how the reviewers' comments have been addressed. I can't see any further issues and recommend its acceptance. There are only some minor language errors that need to be corrected. I suggest the authors proofread the paper again before submitting the final version.

- p.10: "Readers divide over whether" -> "Readers are divided over whether"

- p.10: "a Stoff whose name differ" -> "a Stoff whose name differs"

- p.11: "records who assigned ... on what ground, and when" -> "records who assigned ... on what grounds, and when"

- p.11: "the metafictional question": do you mean "the metaphysical question"?

- p.17: "requirements of GOLEM ontology" -> "requirements of the GOLEM ontology"