Review Comment:
Most of the issues pointed out in my previous revision were addressed, and I the paper is now closer to a publishable version.
On the suggested dimensions for the review, the paper:
(1) Is suitable as an introductory text;
(2) Is comprehensive and has a balanced coverage;
(3) Is well-written;
(4) Covers material that is important for, and not limited to, the Semantic Web community.
I still feel like the authors could have done more in Sec. 4, which is still very long and not clearly structured around Table 4. Nevertheless, it is more structured and slightly better connected now.
Also, despite the authors response, I still have doubts on the claims that the adopted procedure is reproducible.
Besides that, Figure 1 was complemented, Sec 4.3 was restructured, and new pertinent information was added to Sec. 4.6.
There were minor changes in Sec. 5.1. The style is still not much different from Sec 4.1, but it is not so long and it is complemented by the analysis in Sec. 5.2, which now mentions some datasets.
Sec 6 now contains some links to the surveyed systems and datasets.
Sec 7 now includes answers to the research questions.
One minor suggestion, in Sec 6.1.4, is to remove the word "from" before citation [96].
|